Abstract

Discusses the growing use of no-poaching agreements (NPAs) by employers in the EU and US, and whether they constitute anti-competitive restraints. Reviews the increased US enforcement efforts against NPAs, the less developed position in the EU, and its lack of formal policy statements on the issue. Compares the East Asian approach, and advises companies on practical measures to reduce the risk of their NPAs infringing competition law.
Full Paper
Riccardo Tremolada
Research Associate

Since March 2013, Riccardo has been a Research Associate at gLAWcal – Global Law Initiatives for Sustainable Development. Riccardo works as an Associate at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP. He joined the firm in Rome in 2013 and was resident in the Milan office in 2017 and in the Washington D.C. office in 2018.

Summary

Discusses the growing use of no-poaching agreements (NPAs) by employers in the EU and US, and whether they constitute anti-competitive restraints. Reviews the increased US enforcement efforts against NPAs, the less developed position in the EU, and its lack of formal policy statements on the issue. Compares the East Asian approach, and advises companies on practical measures to reduce the risk of their NPAs infringing competition law.

glawcal comments